Hi all, I will shortly be releasing a book I'm writing, I would like to introduce the first page to my book. I believe it speaks about a life experience from a unique perspective, those who follow Ed like I do will enjoy the book.
Thank you to everyone
I dedicate this to my good friend Jeremiah, may he find peace and happyness, and shall we not complete the work that others did not yet finish. (the neverending strand of the presence)
Academic Institution, Part 1
In academic institutions of modern 'thought' 21st century scientists are quickly reminded, and eventually instilled to believe, the notion of 'if it sounds too good to be true, it usually is'.
Ignoring contradiction of historical record (such as Galileo’s theory of gravity being considered by an Egyptian 4000 years before his popularised discovery) we are presented with a very real scientific question, is this a cultural or evolutionary premise? Or both, a cross-over and interactivity. Clearly if culture rejects idea, it will be discovered 4000 years later, again, instead, (and again only perhaps-adopted)
Evolutionarily, the human mind in the last 72,000 years has not changed very much at all. The Academic Institution teaches this in the Darwinian Theory of Evolution. What is missing is combining each individual theory together to form (at least attempts of) one greater truth of the way the system of the universe is working. Combining patterns and systems creates a more complex picture that can allow this to be achieved. It is how the sumarians and occult systems work and all satanist writings lean upon. The aether fields are not evil, people can do that all by themselves.
Because this is very hard to do, these modular-theories are often-not combined in the academic institution.
You must ask yourself as I have, has science forgot that the only reason it broke this information down into categories was so that it could be fathomed – by the limitations that evolution made on our minds to start with.
After each pattern is fathomed it should be carefully broken down and then reconstructed back into the whole universe, as the reason why science broke things up into small parts was to make understanding the universe possible. This may mean that science is not simply the collection of observation, but the way in which those observations are arranged and compared.
We have learnt that science splits a complex universe into separate parts, just to be able to informationally comprehend and limit the patterns of observation, and thus determine what they mean.
This is called isolation, and is a great way to learn new information.
We have learnt that although science splits the universe into separate parts, they are actually part of 1 universal and interconnected system.
We have also learnt that books change faster than a single man's capability.
We have learnt an important premise that many academic institutions (apparently) miss,

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Adv Reply
