Aurora Borealis and the Norway Spirals - why the hidden connection is the sun

[7redorbs]

Yesterday February 18, 2010 famous photographer Dionys Moser took a spectacular image of the Aurora Borealis in Tromso, Norway. However there is something quite striking and different about it.

Do you note how that it looks similar to the Norway Spiral, and yet - yes, it is the Aurora Borealis. We propose that both phenomenons, or rather - the Norway Spiral was not caused by a missile but was in fact caused by the same solar interaction that causes the Aurora Borealis.

The conjecture would be that the particularly unusual spiral shapes forming at the Aurora Borealis could represent the same resonances of a perfect alignment that was witnessed last year in Norway, creating the 'perfect spirals' that seemed to go off towards the sun.

People have shown that it certainly wasn't a missile that created that awesome spectacular spiral. The co-incidences are mounting up. Funnily enough, the best place to see signals like that from the Sun does happen to be both finland and Norway, opening up a more solid hypothesis - the norway spirals [b] could indeed very strongly be linked to the sun, and it seems everything has been done in the Mass Media Press to promote an unfair and irrational proof that this most definitely was a result of a Russian Missile.

Quite to the contrary we think. You decide the below:

image was taken by Dionys Moser Norway, on Feb 18 2010:


image was photographed by Andrew Keen, Finnland on Feb 18 2010:


As you can see, these are truly awe striking Aurora Borealis photographs, and the way they look in 2010 is quite rare, perhaps people will see this in the light that it should be seen.

That it indeed is light affecting it, and perhaps the Spiral , was created in the same way. If we had not suspected we may have overlooked it as many people often do. Checking it out for yourself, perhaps, is quite different than the truths we accept.

Perhaps today really is the ignorant stone-age barbaric assumptions of tomorrows past. What really makes us different to the mayans remains quite small. How we divide ourselves as different becomes ever greater, but what really changes that is physical. Not a lot I would add - not physical to us anyway.

Article by Adam @ CONSPIRACY.CO

Sources:
http://spaceweather.com/aurora/images2010/18feb10/
http://www.fotoreisen.ch/

[A.G.Frog]

I think we should also take into to consideration POLARIS the north star.
It is directly overhead.
I have read in recent magazine article that Polaris was thought to be dying out but now it seems to be gaining in strength again.
The interaction of both of these stars (SUN and POLARIS) with the earth may lead us to new or newly rediscovered theories and methods.
We have no current southern star.
Just a thought
J

[7redorbs]

bump