Some of you will have not heard about remote viewing, but most of you will have. The becoming popular idea of 'seeing remotely' - exactly what it says on the tin.
The main inventor/proponent of which, Ingo Swann, and his story , if true would require rewriting of the 'sophistication' and 'meaning' of the complexity of the human sensory net.
And of course that the sensory net, can recombine information (that the body receives all of from everywher ein the universe).
the main problem, indeed to conventional scientists is seperating it out - claimed to be impossible by conventional science, with a "prove me otherwise" approach. Often the requirement of 'proove me otherwise' is lab conditions, something not easy to always do.. not necesasrily because they cannot reproduce it at will, but rather the way in which they are asked to produce it may be a factor.
Ingo swann of course being an exception, having made a magnetometer move (either emitted a quark under a concrete floor, or was amazingly lucky).
Indeed remote viewing protocol, does 'prove you otherwise' as it's main strategy is to do just that - provide a method using 2 persons to 'guide' the consciousnes of the viewer through the information, and the second person to conjugate that information into something meaningful.
Of course Ingo claims he can do all that mostly on his own.
Fascinating. I will leave you all to decide. Interestingly Ingo Swann claimed that Bin Laden was dead a very long time ago. Is Bin laden dead? Is that the sort of thing a conartist might say? because its so controversial, yes!! Ingo is different though, he does have some amazing insights and ideas, which is why I simply can't classify him in my mind as a liar. He simply isn't, at least not entirely.
A lot of things amazing I have realised thanks to his suitably clever and wise questions.
Decide for yourself!
2nd video:
[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crCpDLGS0Mw&feature=related/video]

2Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Adv Reply
Threadstarter
