Project FORTECH

[KA-Bar]

Did you know that the military has a "Project Fortech"? This is a study of foreign (read alien) technology. You might be interested in what they are doing.

K

[7redorbs]

Hello KA-Bar,
thanks for being kind enough to start with such an interesting comment. I have heard of the study of foreign technology, that specifically are created and setup by black op and black project organisations, and their counter-parting misinformation programmes, Majestic-12 being possibly one of the 'fake' organisations setup, or the fake story being a cover for the real MJ-12. Either way, a cover up is going on, much like that of Roswell (with some irony there too, because that is maybe where it had all begun). However, if you look at the German Nazi Bell programme, you start to realise that perhaps the Roswell handling was genuine by the military, and there had been no US 'bell reclassification' persay. (The Nazi Bell programmer enjoyed a classification higher than Nazi Nuclear Warheads, much like the UFO topic in the US enjoys a similar Security clearance. However, I have never heard of Fortech, interestinglu I instantly think of Fort Worth, they like to be cryptic in the namings of programs as that they are universally understood only be initiates , or those who need to know, yet they are hidden in plain sight, I think.. just requires a thorough analysis and research of the topics!

It's strange I've not heard of Project FORTECH too much, Nothing to do with Forts or Echelon, the NSA / NRO surveilance dictionary system that 'doesnt exist' even though the Australian government prove it? You have raised my interest now, would be curious to hear more.



Best Wishes,
A

[KA-Bar]

The Fortech operation was loosely connected to Project Blue Book and was run from Wright Patterson AFB in OH. This was supposedly the destination of the Roswell artifacts. I wonder if they all worked in the same building? Ah well, we will never know for sure. There is a book called the Fortech Conspiracy and quite a bit of chatter on the internet on this subject.

K

[7redorbs]

Ahh, now you're talking KA-Bar, project bluebook, any UFO enthusiast cannot be without the knowledge of that information gathering program, I too have toyed with whether or not all the Artifacts in fact reached Wright Patterson AFB, there are quite a few different conspiracy theories, I believe one involving such artifacts does involve Texas and Fort Worth, the question is was this a new appropriation or tactic, or was there a preset 'rulebook' in how to deal with such issues.

e.g. was it chain command over our armies heads, or heads side by side by the book policy.

I think it seems like a strange place to start, but I've found these are the only real questions we can answer , at least without giving away the source.

A

[KA-Bar]

I've met Maj. Don Keyhoe and knew Maj. Bob Hart one of the last movers and shakers at Blue Book. It was an interesting project. Bob told me that about 10% of the sitings were truly unknown. That is all he would say. I have an autographed copy of Don's book.

K

[7redorbs]

Wow really? As much as 10%? That's the 10% we're interested in ;-) certainly, I have traced an interest of UFO's in the US military dating possibly as far back to WW2 nazi Germany. As aforementioned the Nazi 'bel'l programme enjoyed a higher classification of secrecy and top secret clearance than their nuclear program, which contrary to popular belief, existed; and it was this 'war critical' classification The German Nazi Secret Service issued for either some propagandist reason yet discovered, or other more surprising lines of inquiry and thought, such as the inheritance of this program, possible technology, and study of by US intelligence organisations. Of course, it was no secret UFO's were of an interest to Germany, I believe any competent intelligence organization would take up such heed to mimic their enemy counterparts surveillance interest and research, which is indeed of course what happened with the migration of the V2 program and scientists from Germany (Project Paperclip 1945) .

If what you say is true, and you do indeed know these people what you are saying is quite a bombshell there, is there anything else you can tell us? Unknown after all isn't much better than unexplained, but wow, what a great start!!!

thanks again,
A

[KA-Bar]

Well, I spent quite a few hours talking about this with LLoyd Mallan, author of several popular books on this subject. He was recenlty interviewed on one of the programs that was researching the Roswell incident. He is quite a guy and very knowledgable. Actually, all of my posts here boil down to one thing. I have not said anything of substance because anything I could say would be speculation. No one, in spite of all those I knew or met, said anything concrete. It was all "what if" or "maybe".

I can say that the 10% figure was correct. I can add that Blue Book kept a series of ID photos that they would show to people who saw UFOs and have them identify the photo or sketch that most closely resembled what they saw and they used that as their classification method of sightings.

I also have been told by reliable sources that Area 51 is not what we all keep thinking it is. So, your comments about Texas and mine about Wright Patterson may hold water.

K

[7redorbs]

Wow KA-Bar you certainly seem to have done the rounds in terms of talking to pretty much some of the most famous figures, that's amazing. Although I totally believe you, perhaps some of the other users would appreciate any terms of proof that you known these people? Again, not that I doubt you whatsoever, but if what you say is true - it really is no small news. No testimony is, especially if it can be backed up with some cold facts.

I agree there is much speculation and a scattered array of facts through history, however I am somewhat of the opinion that if you look back far enough and deep enough and trust your gut,there are some wild speculations that can be posited, and tested - and that's the beauty of what we are trying to do with CONSPIRACY.CO. So that such methodology that can be scientifically tested becomes wildly held as a universal paradigm of furthering clarity and truth, rather than allowing the 'industrius status quo' which seems to live on in society , in my opinion of course ;-) I don't think its hard if we honestly look around.

I have heard many eye witness testimony supporting that A51 is not what we think, my research (and gut instincts) point towards the possibility that A51 is a munitions and flight testing ground, and it is not the main base. Also my research has suggested, albeit weakly that a highly sophisticated defence system, possibly UFO based guards the air space of the facility (there is a video on CONSPIRACY.CO of a pilot flying into A51 live on air and being shot down) - shortly before it goes dead (the phone that is!) - you hear a noise that is very reminiscent to many of the videos of UFo's flying around A51, like a pulsating buzzing or humming sound.

Maybe ask your friends about that sort of line of inquiry, we must discern reactions and honesty, I suppose and that the human equation is not secluded from that, just conveniently omitted. I think that has to change

Thanks so much for sharing this!!

A

[KA-Bar]

I will be happy to scan in the autograph on the book by Don Keyhoe. If I can find Lloyd's book, I will also scan in the book cover with autograph. (I can't find Lloyd's book. I put it in such a safe place even I can't find it. ) What is worse, I have 2. He sent me a second copy with autograph.

What else can I do to prove things but say "I worked on project Fortech" So, disbelieve me or talk to your partner. ;) He might be of help. He knows me.

K

[7redorbs]

Hi Ka-Bar! Thanks for replying. I'd already spoken to Sean and knew you were legit already ;) I for one believe you, in aliens, ufo's and some pretty bizarre things that scientists would call me an idiot just for considering. I have to say sometimes the feeling is quite mutual;as you say though it's tough when people like us know something is true when scientists say "proof or no proof" determines reality, or truth, no - it just determines whether we get ridiculed or not. ;)

I will have a word with Sean and see if we can take the line of inquiry further, so many people are just frustrated with peoples rejection of this topic, myself included, and as a result many don't care if others believe them - I guess we don't need to change anyone, and i'm not saying that, but we should definitely inform them

Sorry if it seemed like I was doubting you, the truth of it is, Autistic people could be the greatest geniuses on the planet, but if they can't tell other people how does it help them.

I guess that's why autistic and supposedly 'disabled' people are stigmatised, much like this topic - inside is a great brilliance traded for some measure of reduced communication. I think a lesson is here, that there is a price for everything and none are too high, only what the buyer or seller sets. If for every force there really is an equal and opposite action any disability to communicate should have a counter-parted advantage, implying the very idea of disability, dis empowerment, justification or superiority, or but an illusion. (and that any great brilliance inherited, is traded for some amount of isolation, especially when individuals are surrounded by people who not only don't believe, but in many cases don't want to consider, or care about it in the first place.)

I think that anti-trust and stigma is an age old problem, or 'excuse', for the real problem - the individual.

That's why I'm out to call for pressing reset on the UFO/Alien stigmatization button. 1% is far too much to ignore, 10% is a gaping hole to science and that's why I am working hard on getting people talking about it on CONSPIRACY.CO

thank you again!

A