Terance Mckenna & Time Wave Zero

[7redorbs]

Many of you may have heard of the great theorist and shamanic student, known as Mr Mckenna.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...2459684666916#

Time Wave Zero, in my opinion represents a set (of 64 hexagrams) generating a linear progression (I like to refer to the pairs as Superposition relativities like Standing Waves in Quantum Theory)

As Mckenna says, the hexagrams are in pairs. Is it possible these pairs somehow simulate the convergence of space and time - using chance as a common denominator or 'simulator', if you will - allowing 2 non linear pairs to generate 1 linear chance diffraction pattern per-say.

I only make such assertions given that QED speaks a lot about interactive quantum chances (or potentials).. something like throwing a dice would be a crude but similar example of these quantum chances or potentials... (it's like adding up all of your dice throws, or coin flips) - chance itself has a non linear result at a low n (low number of throws), but as it gets higher and higher, it becomes more linear and linear.

Quantum physics discovers the same thing.. however it is believed by many that repeating an experiment an inadvertently large number of times and taking the average is an increase in accuracy of measurement.

If you really break it down.. scientists measure current going through a wire many times and take an average of that to determine the current flowing through the wire... knowing full well that no constant is output, knowing full well that the conservative average is the very least likely of current to be going through the wire at any individual splice of time..

Interestingly, this means what is seen on a multimeter is in scientific reality, because it is measured and observed.. and the average is a signature of conservation and stability over long periods of time (linearity); but this is in fact a result created by the convergence of random fluctuations in the individual measurements ( as observed before total current / total number of measurements ).

In short, we are talking about a standing wave in regard to Time Wave Zero, convergance between the microcosm of the order of 1 and the macrocosm of the order of infinity. In between exists non linear fluctuation, and in order to linearized that.. an average must be taken.

It is really not surprising that Science believed in order for something to be science , it has to be measurable, and predictable enough so that a rule can be applied. Obviously when scientists encountered this 'flux' factor, they realised it had to be removed to make linear rules apply.

Mathematically this rule of flux can only be totally removed at points before 1 sample and at or after infinity sample. QED records this well, you look at the wavelengths, but in order to look you have to minutely effect them in order to measure them (I call it the rule or order or interaction)

Leaving of course the main point that dear Terance Mckenna tried so hard to educate his opinions and experiences and improvisations of - which was - this non linear reality exists everywhere converging into a 'total' reality we observe.. but in material demonstrability, for science to begin it's material science, it's first undertaking would have to be to remove such wave convergence obstacles muddying their data and averaging large samples is a perfect way to do that.

Thanking Terance Mckenna for this wonderful knowledge.


A