Insect anti-gravity and Cavity Structural Effect

[Rediscover]

The real discovery is when there is definitive proof that magnetic particles exist and are found to be two and not one; working with each other's attraction/repulsion.!

Maybe just one would suffice, because of their paramount motion, direction could determine their properties of being north or south pole. This in the end would eliminate the individual properties of the particle at all whereas all will be determined by the poles themselves and the particle is solely an effect of the existence of the poles.

This looks like your two poles, maybe a little different, but still ;)

Our static view might also interfere with our understanding of it all, motion is therefore, always.

[remelic]

You are right in that there can be only one particle. It can either be a south-pole up vortex or a south-pole down vortex. That's all that needs to be different for polarity to work. Balanced power just needs to be projected at the center of a bar. If you project it at the end of a bar you will get a majority of one kind of charge but this needs verification.

[Rediscover]

Please have a look at this and the following post I made on this forum:

http://www.CONSPIRACY.CO/forums/amateur-....html#post2716

If you would then consider the plane of zero pressure as the magnetic axis/plane then we might find a common view.

For me then one question remains, how to create and control the the poles in the magnetic plane. We know how to create electrical polarity, even magnetic polarity but somehow we seem to be unable to use natures principle of creating an imbalance which chases itself. If work should be done by that then the load should be a part of this process instead of something which kills the process by destroying polarity.

[Cynar]

If I had the math skills of a University professor I'd show you.

This text book covers near enough everything about electromagnetism, from a mathematical point of view.

Introduction to Electrodynamics (Pie): Amazon.co.uk: David J. Griffiths: Books

Also. The effect you seem to be alluding too is a charged ion rocket. They work, but require v.high static voltages (10,000-1,000,000V or more). I did some work with a variant of them at A-level. I'm sure Adam remembers the ion beam from a van-de-graph generator that could deliver a electrostatic charge to someone over 20ft away >:-). Back on point though. It doesn't repel the earth's field. It creates a beam of moving air, just like a water bottle rocket. Unfortunately the effect is very weak and tends to rapidly charge the source (the insect), and you don't see many bees arcing to ground.

The over effect, pushing on a magnetic field, doable except the earth's field would just collapse (locally) when a large field is applied. (It's like trying to stand on air when your really heavy).

And, FYI, your close when you say that the world around us is magnetic in nature your not far off. In fact it's electromagnetic. It's what governs all of chemistry, while the strong force governs nuclear effects, and gravity bulk mass effects. That book covers a lot of things regarding EM and matter if I remember, and is well worth a read. It even mentions magnetic monopoles, the magnetic equivalent of electrons (Just remember it's a text book, not a pop-sci book!)

Cynar

[7redorbs]

Thanks Cynar, I never actually took the time to thank you for your contribution to this article. I'm with Frog, but I believe that it is important for us to work together to truly get to the bottom of the truth.

Though, I am with remelic, the day that magnetic particles are accepted as the basis for life and aether fabric will be the day that C stays constant, but a certain realisation that at levels of the invisible aether beyond that of usual visible dimensionality, the speed of transmission is different. Pi / 2 * C . Making C a constant, not a limit.

Though it's well worth noting I know cynar disagrees, and perhaps he is correct!!!



Best,
A