I believe I know how Mozart wrote music so quickly, and precisely fractal Music works

[7redorbs]

OK GUYS, I wrote another one, this one took 10 minutes (yes, I'm getting faster and faster and faster) - you know - mozart was born with it right- you don't need to do the maths... your mind does that just by determining whether them music is harmonious. If only I could write at his level at this speed.


Another Short Musical Cipher
(Vitruvian/As Above is Below/Tesla 3 6 9 - numerological non linear geometry and superposition harmonics)

Infact, it took me about 1 hour and a half to do the diagram, and 10 minutes to write the score( ha ha ha ha)

Ok guys, knock yourselves out. This musician chose not to be greedy. You know that stratrek quote, it took 10,000 years, to find out it doesn't have to take 10,000 years.. ;) Not with help.

first a link to the music:

http://media.CONSPIRACY.CO/music/second_mozart_cipher_davinci.mp3

of course the instrument choice makes a difference:

http://media.CONSPIRACY.CO/music/second_mozart_cipher_davinci_piano.mp3

10 minutes, just 10 minutes... ;) no longer. Don't spoil the broth.
The musical Score is: 6 Bars + final 4 notes makes 7.

The tune consists of Bar Pattern: 1,2,3,4,5,6,5,6,1,2,1,3,4,5,6,6,7

This makes a total of 68 bars , the melody is in the hexegram 64 set, much like ut queant laxis, in the solfeggio. The geometrical methodology is not dissimilar.

Each bar has 4 parts (instruments) - usually

Each bar has 4 divisions (ratio's intersecting horizontally) - this is the scale of time.

This, makes a total of 16 bars + 1 (17 Bars).



Bar 1



Remember, it's just what you hear that determines the maths aswell. Not just reverse (i.e. you listening to it hearing the math and recognising it). I can do this by ear, or by vision, on the fly playing indefinitely, or on the fly writing indefinitely.

It makes no difference, if only you know how.


Bar2



Bar 3



Bar 4



Bar 5



Bar 6


Bar 7 is 4 notes, E G# (Ab) , B , E (the 4 fold completion of an arpeggio) - i didn't include it, it's not interesting.


Why I did it again, an Explanation

This is a response to frog's friend who had a deep desire to try and understand this

It could be said, I had a deep desire to understand this too - and I'm still not quite sure. Yes, though, this is how it is being done in my abstract mind, and very quickly too. Many days of work can be completed in a few seconds if you are looking at it fractionally.

WHY?????? Because division is implied connectiveness too, but of course ;) Don';t quote me on that though. I'll get eaten alive by people who can't play piano for shit.

I will be honest though, the shorter the cipher the easier, the longer, the more complex and extremely frustrating and angry it can make you - there is a reason why some people have bad tempers - if only they could realise why they were frustrated - we are the music makers

A

PS: When I enter in these notes I can hear each note I add in the speaker played to me - this is helpful, my next demonstration will be - with the speakers turned off. I will have to use the visual cortex (my eyes) a lot more then.

Less translation - something like that - keep posted for more interesting musical feats.. when I get my lab and studio up guys, rather than this ghetto crap I have now - it's gonna be rocking!!

[l.f.theria]

I wish I'd had a chance to actually hear what it was that you wrote.

[nestack]

I wish I'd had a chance to actually hear what it was that you wrote.

Agreed.....anyway you can do a youtube or wav track?

[7redorbs]

guys, sorry about this. You may note there is a link to the music twice. The problem is the link is broke, trying to fix now.

Best,
A