U.K. Cancer Death Rate is 38% higher than in the US

[7redorbs]

In 2008, Britain had a cancer death rate 0.25% while the United States had a rate of only 0.18%. The UK cancer death rate was 38% higher than in the United States.

The Guardian, the UK’s left wing daily, estimated that “up to 10,000 people” are dying each year of cancer “because their condition is diagnosed too late, according to research by the government’s director of cancer services.” While many people die because of late detection due to their own negligence, there is no reason to believe this self-neglect is more common in the UK than in the US.

One word; Alcohol.. One of the main cancer causing chemicals - don't use alcoholic mouthwash daily IMO, unless you want to risk mouth cancer. One could imagine that's not too fun!

Big Government Blog Archive U.K. Cancer Death Rate Is 38% Higher Than In U.S.

[PolarKnight]

this was recently discovered here in Canada.

[video]ftnNU70dSPs[/video]

[7redorbs]

great find polarknight , A gent called rick simpson has been promoting cannabis as a cure to skin cancer and heart disease, and even as an autoimmune suppressor and regulator, even as a neurological/brain chemistry regulator.

NO PROFIT = NO RESEARCH = INDEED

As it turned out, not only did the Canadian Cancer Society want nothing to do with it, neither did the LEGION he was having his meets at, it was just getting too popular. As a result TPB had the legion bar Rick Simpson and his party.

It's okay though, since it has been proven beyond doubt that Cannabis totally reverses brain cancers in vivo. Visa vie - Rick Simpson, and tens of thousands of years of herbal medicine culture was right all along. boy oh boy, what a surprise ;-)

Great stuff buddy

[GVIDEO]-7331006790306000271[/GVIDEO]

[video]pjhT9282-Tw[/video]

It would be sad if people didn't try it, who were dying, death is needless when the right drugs exist to fix the issue - all doctors know that. Why does the public have such an issue getting that the problem really is us and using these chemicals and biological enzymes responsibly and effectively, not making people suffer because of money, or because of others making money - not removing and ignoring herbal cures, because they are not profitable and cannot be mass produced synthetically.

Stop the crime, start the cure - and keep on livin, that my motto

NO PROFIT = NO RESEARCH = NO BUSINESS

The problem isn't directly pharmaceuticals in the writers opinion, it's the nature of exploitative business, and usury based pyramidal gold reserve systems. In essence, the defecit is created by the nature of the method instigated by the designer, and payed by the innocent, poor, and exploited.

This is a fact, but *shrug* you'd have to actually know how the banking system worked and work hard at the reasoning behind it - turns out there is none, as long as each citizen is paying interest, and not the bank, all is good. This madness surely started long ago, in england, and was extended to the US, until this day.

Funnily enough this would make some sense, no profit, no research, because there is no business in un-patentable products. They're right, it was made the law, perhaps the most important question is why was THAT law created?

I have this saying, protect the intelligent patent not prudence . It's a way of saying protect the intelligent, not the indistrius foo's who can afford prudence.

This is the way it seems to me

A