So, whats this Paranormal stuff!


I'd like to introduce you to the realm of the strange, mysterious, mystical, and downright BIZARRE

A lot of people think that there is something abnormal about the paranormal, but if it exists in the universe why wouldn't it be business as usual?

Of course, it is not a secret that many consider the paranormal ridiculous and non existent; obviously if this judgement was based on its name alone, it would be highly founded.


The definition of Paranormality explicitly means to
lack scientific explanation,
demonstrability
and repeatable material evidence,
NOT a lacking foundation in reality, as insisted by many for so long.

A Caveat for Angry Scientists
Such statements like above may upset the learned, Skeptical and Scientific among us. Many scientists incorrectly think that a theory has to be proven, in order to exist in reality.

Because of this, Science is often the method of refusing to work with, or take seriously, anything that cannot be measured (and not through choice, Science is the study of materially measurable events, it cannot be science if it cannot be measured in a conceivable way). Regardless of the fact of emerging non linear sciences such as Quantum Physics which already prove this beyond doubt, many scientist remain negatively skeptical about the existence of non material, non linear sciences that already are beginning to explain the paranormal science of Unique Events.

Science is the art of repeatable science and QED is it's worst nightmare, and paranormal's greatest savior; at the very least some of us aren't just seeing things. At the very least, science now has to admit that QED is representational of a non linear, frankly paranormal world. No material rules apply, it's not science. Yet it's stilled called a Science, hence the confusion - and it's not your fault , or sciences - we just aren't sure how to deal with it, but I would like to at least get this point straight for once.

This is where things begin to get a bit scary, is what we call 'crazy' actually what we think? or something more TO DO with QED and the non linear physics?

Such a thing wouldn't surprise an obsessive researcher such as myself, as consciousness is the ultimate non linear machine.. Atheists in disagreement.. look to Theism please.

The Informational Mind

Consciousness is still very much a word undefined by Psychologists, the brain remains still much of a mystery. Yet Atheists allow themselves to discount the paradigm of Para-normality based on their own conscious mind, knowing full well the very mechanism of belief and knowledge, simply currently perplexes , and has dazed and confused the greatest minds and philosophers of our time for millenia.

Some argue that Material science is a reversal from Alchemical, Esoteric Egyptian and Sumerian dualism, and that Hebrew 'has the word entanglement in it for a reason', this remains to be seen. However it is clear symbolic metaphor seems to share and make much similarities between Consciousness and Para-normality Undeniable. The sophistication of language and it's connection to consciousness seems to be inexorably linked to cognition and communication. In fact, there is very real evidence that man is able to create things that devolve the ability of consciousness (some Atheists call it Theism, and some Theists might call it Atheism)

We should be asking ourselves, if anyone was in the same 'normal' reality, don't you think more people would agree more often?

And anyway, if anyone was in the same 'normal' reality , don't you think we'd all see the same brightness of light, or timbre of sound??? No, not at all.. the universe isn't like that ! Evolution shows this. Reality is but a small boundary we call 'real', irrecoverably damaging the understanding of any realm beyond our material idea. The first, best and only step seems to be to accept the proof material science is showing about limited cognition and genomic evolution, pointing in the strong direction of things that would be considered paranormal to merely be a manifestation of a system or process, merely on the edge of our perception, or in direct convergance with it - in some undetectable way - any possible consideration to explanation must be better than ignoring the material science that points to this fact (just because you can't see IR doesn't mean its not there, dark matter, etc).

Normality, appears to be a very individual thing, and the universe tends to agree with its inventions by an undiagnosable fallacy of God, or by the master & almighty creator himself.

I would argue if one was to declare himself Atheist, then that one has found a way to disprove God, or has decided his consciousness is large enough to expand beyond the size of the universe, being the requirement of a self referential argument to mathematically resolve as an integer (i.e. something real). This of course, is an unaccepted theory, but merits real questioning and study.

W

If chess were a game you did not understand, then you would have no way of unraveling meaning. If the universe were in the place of chess, first you must noble yourself to that it is beyond your scope of existance; after such a time you have entered a new realm of consciousness, one that has accepted and realized the science of reality is expansive and comprehensive easily beyond the planets conceivability, even today. That the genome is but a small part of a perception ever expansive and ever variant.

To make this realisation one can no longer be a `believer` or a `Skeptic`, but someone who lives to play a game of truly unimaginable possibilities, and so it should be, to us humans, that is just what the universe is, it is in fact our familiarity with our world which sometimes leads us to forget the minuscule-ness of this world, let alone ourselves.

Arthur C Clarke - any sufficiently advanced technology is magic to anyone


A