+ Reply to Thread ‹‹ Back to Forum
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    co-founder
    7redorbs's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,743
    Liked
    258 times
    Images
    224

    ElectroMagnetic Current

    Introduction

    This writing is lined up to the East
    so that you can read it better. It is still good for living as well as your scientific or psycho-sociological work. What you see is in the west.

    In modern 21st century society we can give thanks in the widening common knowledge of the existence of the natural cycle and the natural flow of currents. Such as the natural convection cycle of magma, or the natural cycle of convection that determines when it rains. The cycle of natural wind forces, and indeed, the cycle of life, and the nitrogen cycle from the top soil that those natural wind forces can bring.


    is everything that has liberated energy moving in 1D? A perfect circle. A perfect Cycle?


    Static Orbits are Perpetual Movement

    static means that the diameter from the center stays "still" on 1 dimension (y), the movement is still circular because of another 1d right angle force (x)

    For all intensive purposes man bows to the forces of nature, but perhaps man does not bow to the fact, that - many of these natural systems seem to be operating in exactly the same way. They are Cycle based. Even the human body has a perpetual blood flow system, admittedly with a min and max tolerance - but in all essence, the machine of the human being is perpetual.

    Indeed, genetics, evolution, wind movement, solar electromagnetic flares, orbits, and cycles of nitrogen, are not just connected together, but apparently perpetual. As perpetual as an orbit, it stays fixed unless the relativity between it and the object is changed by another relative force. Such as a supernovae, for instance.




    The Butterfly Effect & Chaos Theory


    The butterfly effect , Chaos Theory, and Heisenberg's uncertainty principle all talk off the metaphorical butterfly, or Schroedingers' cat which sits in the box. The argument is always 'of course that cat is dead' - however that is not the point of the theory; the point of the theory is that your quantum spin is *changed* by looking at, or not looking at the cat. Whether or not its dead or not. You could say, looking at the cat, involves a photon/electron interaction, or perpetual spin being modified, at a quantum level, thus changing the dead cat at a very tiny seemingly 'unimportant' sub-atomic level - the cat does not come back to life, or magically grow a new foot. You do not magically pass go and collect $200. That said, the chance of that probability tree, compared to not looking at the cat is different - and results in a different 'life' of the cycle


    The Aurora Borealis


    We know that the Aurora Borealis is a cause of the effect of Solar Rays interacting with the earths magnetosphere, a level of interaction between two relative objects. You could say, because there are only two that it is a polar effect; in being much like the dividing of a cell at the basic genetic level of the determinism of life. For indeed, the dividing of a cell in the human animal alone requires the suns energy on a daily basis, and arisen in the first place because of it; without the sun many of the cycles would end .

    Perhaps it would be permissible to consider that the earths magnetosphere developed largely due to the suns influence, and it's ability to provide a supply of perpetual energy, to develop the magnetic poles of the earth today. Regardless of whether this conjecture is true, what is clear, all these systems are connected. I am of the opinion that the Egyptians and other highly advanced cultures, more advanced than us in many ways at the admission of engineers and science - because they held a high divining - these cycles - there was a certain amount of wisdom imparted from what Tesla always believed in; observe nature, the copy it.


    A matter of theory, Inter spacial Dynamics

    One could consider that, if there really are these perpetual cycles everywhere on the planet, and in the life and the human body, then perhaps - buildings, or structures, like the pyramids, sitting directly across from the Nile are some sort of regulator for the creation and destruction of these currents, and eddy currents that form in streams.




    Same old cycle, different earth day; It's all Free, its not all everlasting

    Structures like Dams and reservoirs, would modify the perpetual cycle of natural current flows of rivers and streams and fresh water creation; indeed in fact it is not a far long stranger of the 20th century, of great disasters, floods and possibly other natural disasters being caused by an inherent lack of understanding in the long term implications of short term benefit. That is, in a cycle - the duration of "0" point, will differ based on the length of the cycle and the number of influencing factors. This can make predicting the weather or drought difficult , and in most recent research is allegedly the reason why the Mayan civilization fell - many other civilizations in the Desert made similar fatal mistakes - they did not realise the underground fresh water desert reservoirs were built from a perpetual buildup over long term - and short term could be depleted far faster than it could be replaced.



    Indeed, much like oil is today - it is interesting how the parallels of the past change. Because In fact we do the same things tribes of Africa were doing in 2000 BC, the only difference is, we dig a lot deeper, and we are looking for carbon energy.

    Us at CONSPIRACY.CO certainly hope that we will not become a destitute society by our own failings to convince our leaders to commit to a more beneficial adoption of energy gathering. After all all of the energy is free - the price we pay is our home. Spaceship Earth as my dear friend mentioned.


    The Suns Energy - The Future Millenia

    Simply if we could harness just a small portion of the suns total energy, admittedly there is no practical way to do that yet - is that something capitalist material consume then ask questions later man really wants to invest in until the oil is gone? Hopefully though, it will never be too late, when the likes of you and me are continually thinking on this model.

    Simply, if there was a cheap way to get into space - which is ready now and has been delayed apparently by NASA due to the economic crisis - nobody would ever have to pay an electricity bill again.

    Short story is most of the people in power and wealth, would not be anymore. We must wonder if wealth will ever be a consideration of materialism when we are making use of a power source almost limitless for our direct needs in the next few millenia.


    The Sun & It's Currents



    The sun creates 'arcs' or currents that seem similar to the behaviour of wind, water, and evolutionary genetic patterns of carbon based life

    The Magma Current Convection Cycle





    Geomagnetic Storms, The Cycle, Brainwaves, Brain Function

    Russia and NASA's experience with No localised magnetic north pole in Space - madness

    Without the natural currents of the north pole, and it's south counterpart, the human brain, and indeed memory begins to fail. What some people refer to this cavity resonance to is the Schumann resonance which the earth generates between approx 7.2 and 9.2hz - it is a critical electromagnetic waveform resonance that has been shown scientifically to regulate heart rate, blood flow, memory, brain cognition and decision making . Many of the first Russian cosmonauts became mentally unstable and insane and suffered from damaged memory, due to the neglect of taking this important human bio-field dependence into consideration. It is likely all life on the planet, in some way - depends on the naturally available resources.

    NASA has benefited from this knowledge, protecting their astronauts from suffering the same brain cognition and body function failures using a Schumann generator aboard the shuttle - when they are not in the natural earth presence of this invisible yet life giving, and indeed dependent field.



    Atomic Orbitals - Electron Cycles



    "An atomic orbital is a mathematical function that describes the wave-like behavior of either one electron or a pair of electrons in an atom.[1] This function can be used to calculate the probability of finding any electron of an atom in any specific region around the atom's nucleus. These functions may serve as three-dimensional graph of an electron’s likely location. The term may thus refer directly to the physical region defined by the function where the electron is likely to be.[2] Specifically, atomic orbitals are the possible quantum states of an individual electron in the collection of electrons around a single atom, as described by the orbital function." - Wikipedia.org

    Despite the obvious analogy to planets revolving around the Sun, electrons cannot be described as solid particles and so atomic orbitals rarely, if ever, resemble a planet's elliptical path.

    "The idea that electrons might revolve around a compact nucleus with definite angular momentum was convincingly argued in 1913 by Niels Bohr,[4] and the Japanese physicist Hantaro Nagaoka published an orbit-based hypothesis for electronic behavior as early as 1904.[5] However, it was not until 1926 that the solution of the Schrödinger equation for electron-waves in atoms provided the functions for the modern orbitals.[6]" - Wikipedia.org



    The Water Cycle - all about currents

    (Sky Interaction (energy), Ocean Currents(energy), Wind Currents(energy)
    Interestingly a vortex is the interaction between 2 or more wind currents





    Global Air Currents



    Darwinian Evolution Currents


    Darwinian Evolution presents, a model for the perpetuity of life, or the evolution of the ability for life to become more suitably equipped to perpetually survive, genetically, and as a global specie. It seems that life required a non static requirement.

    It is particularly interesting that a static orbit, creates this non static requirement. Could it be that irrational numbers (orbits of pi) have a gravitic relationship with the currents of other localized systems. This certainly seems plausible, if perhaps without using the word gravitic. The point is that a 'stable' orbit represents stable relativity, but not static movement. The stable orbit seems to allow movement to perpetually occur via spin and a static 1d vector (@~90 degrees to the sun).

    Which Meme?
    how to admit your pants go up and down with the sun the non-psychotic way
    avoiding conspiracy tosh

    It is particularly interesting how all of the critical inter-actors appear - identical - to each-other. Is one mimiccing the other? Or is their a universal premise to which both systems of electromagnetic current abide together? Possibly. What does seem to be true is, other than the Chaos theory and the butterfly effect, only a slim few people at NASA realise how the genetic biosystems, are related to the planetary ones, and the planetary ones are related to the central Sun-star itself.

    Perhaps chaos theory and schroedingers wave and electron orbit theories were trying to accommodate the pseudo psychological premises of society - and describe some how that each mans pants go up and down with the sun. Either intentionally or not, knowingly or unknowingly - if the sun did not come up one day - the butterfly effect cares not of the consideration - and delivers the necessity of difference, a quantum probability tree of dissemination amongst each node quite different and unique.



    The Nodes are all the Same - interdependent currents

    The electromagnetic universe, would seem to me, to be - the correlation of relativity between electrical nodes. That is not only what plants, human beings, and the planet is - but that is what the sun is too, and emits constantly. Vast amounts of electricity. It's all energy afterall.

    Perhaps that's why all the energy wants to act like a wave and CYCLE AS WELL AS ORBIT as a mass as a 1d vector. The universe seeks stability. But there are two sides to stability, positive and negative.

    1. This is a fact.
    2. It's also a fact the Egyptians trusted in this belief. Every single piece of egyptian art has 2 distinct sides, or charges - a positive and a negative.
    3. Nikola Tesla, Wilhelm Reich and Edward Leedskalnin believed in the duality principle. Most of Tesla's devices, which are still not understood were claimed to him to work in this manner.[/b]
    4. Archaic Revival may be more scientifically interesting than initially realized.







    The Nitrogen Cycle & Ocean Currents
    In Chemistry, Even the Nitrogen Cycle is in perpetuity
    (Definition of Perpetual: producing work without expenditure, i.e. acid erosion from rain)





    "The nitrogen cycle is the process by which nitrogen is converted between its various chemical forms. This transformation can be carried out via both biological and non-biological processes. Key processes in the nitrogen cycle include fixation, mineralization,nitrification, and denitrification. The majority of Earth's atmosphere (approximately 78-80%) is nitrogen,[1] making it the largest pool of nitrogen. However, atmospheric nitrogen is unavailable for biological use, leading to a scarcity of usable nitrogen in many types of ecosystems. The nitrogen cycle is of particular interest to ecologists because nitrogen availability can affect the rate of key ecosystem processes, including primary production and decomposition. Human activities such as fossil fuel combustion, use of artificial nitrogen fertilizers, and release of nitrogen in wastewater have dramatically altered the global nitrogen cycle." - Wikipedia.org

    The Human Body Circle-ation of Currents


    The human body mimics the same electromagnetic properties that are observed in the sun, the carbon, nitrogen cycle, and the system of evolution. A cyclical efficacy is the best approach for the movement , or perpetuity of energy. A system of such limited perpetual effect also - is able to carry out work - without expending additional energy. Indeed, the human body is a very effective energy converter. However not more effective than the ocean, or the wind. Certainly the wind and the ocean are too, not more powerful than the sun. The source of each power becomes more obvious. Stolen from another perpetual source. (a perpetual source being anything atomic (microscopic) or macroscopic (a human circulatory system) - both were are similar maybe because they are all based on the same t hing, or are independent feedback forming a certain cellular bio-dependent feedback, as indicated by say, the Schumann resonance. That is life appears to use what is available to gain its advantage - with survival being a basis of genetic propagation




    Earthquake Deformation Cycle


    Even Earthquakes have been found to repeat a certain pattern or cycle, likely due to the phasing patterns and cycles of the flow of surface magma , and deep compacted magma pushing out in volcanic eruptions in a linear diffraction pattern, but as a result of non linear irrational cyclical processes, of bio-feedback, and energy-Interaction & feedback. The sun and the earth seem to appear to act like giant capacitors or batteries. Just in the first few feet of ocean water alone, there is enough potential to run the world for 2 centuries, including the exponential energy requirement growth between. The same might be said for lightning or Magnetosphere derived power, like when NASA attempted to do this during the STS-75 'tether incident' made popular by the NASA smoking gun video tape. Allegedly the UFO's are space crystals. I genuinely believe they could be 'someone or something else' - concerned as to what we will do to ourselves, or them - the locked up potential in just 1 atom, is enough to destroy the world a few times over. Physicists still parent sure how to harness that power, or to get it to release it, without 'collapsing in on itself'.


    [video]lBIrANSMihg[/video]



    Above all, to thy known self be true

    For indeed, no civilization or individual can have one thing, and complain of another, without being in oneself already without the other, and complacent oneself. Jesus said the same thing, throw the first stone. Perhaps It's a shame when irreplaceable wisdom can be taken out of context!!!


    Feynman Photon Exchange & Temporal Currents










    End Game
    Perhaps the earthquakes are predictable because the magma and volcanic and water cycles are. Effecting the continental shifts, as much as they are being effected by the sun, and indeed, as much as we are affected by the continental shifting ourselves. There is certainly a level of feedback, symbiosis, and progenitor-ship associated with the genetic psychological & sociopolitical precepts being developed in scientific and archaic definitions, some are indeed better than others. In statistical chance, quantum probability, and the kaballistic tree of life. No civilization can ever be beyond it's own superiority or judgement. That is not how relativity and duality works

    We may be closer to something than man ever has been. Arthur C Clarke, Gene Rodenbury, Nikola Tesla, Edward Leedskalnin and Terance Mckenna would surely agree - anyone who thinks freely and intellectually - without self-righteous abstract- usually does. The truth really is out there, and it happens to be close enough for a man to grasp and know happiness for the first time.

    That is, to learn where he really is, and how beautiful and huge what he or she really is, can be a part of

    If one current, or person, is changed, they all are. Enter empowerment.
    Attached Images  

  2. #2
    co-founder
    Threadstarter

    7redorbs's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,743
    Liked
    258 times
    Images
    224
    If anyone would like to contribute you can contact me at adam@CONSPIRACY.CO

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Rediscover's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    36
    Liked
    2 times

    On periodicity

    A very interesting approach which raises more questions than it answers but maybe that's what we are here for: to find the right questions to ask and maybe then find we will the right answers.

    To leave our old paradigms which we are indoctrinated with right from our birthday seems the hardest part, the cognitive dissonance keeps our core belief system in place.

    Maybe if we are able to pose a few questions on ourselves we could find some direction:

    What are our current premises, are we able to detect them ourselves in nature ?
    Do we know scientific facts to be true or are we relying on former work of scientists ?

    Just to examplify what I'm trying to say, please consider the following: we are able to measure electric effects in everything we know, the sun, the earth, atoms, the electron, the human body. We also measure a periodicity in all of them. So we have two effects, electricity an periodicity, what is the cause, or maybe for a starter, how are they related ?

    If periodicity has something to do with movement over time and electricity is just the value at a given point in time then we have a closed system which can be pondered upon. Not only could we observe this single system but also try to find interactions with other single systems if any.

    Why even consider strange illusive unmeasurable things like color force, strong force and gravity ? We twist and bend spacetime, we think of space as an empty void but let it carry trillions of Watts per femtosecond of energy from the sun, still it is at an absolute zeropoint of temperature. We even think that the universe is not scalable, there isn't the faintest idea of the size of the universe in both ways but hey, if it's smaller than Planck we change the rules.

    I know, I know, I'm ranting, but I am so sick and tired of parroting scientists and educators who love the paradigm box they are in so much that they close their eyes for other boxes or things outside the box. I hope you are not offended by anything I say, it's nothing personal, on the contrary I very much enjoy and respect the views on this website because they seem also to come from people who are willing to think outside the box. Thank you all for that.

    Of course, I'm not smart enough to figure everything out myself, so I had a little help from a guy named Walter Russell, another forgotten genius, somebody to whom Nikola Tesla said: "Please bury this information for a thousand years because humanity is not ready for it". This guy was able to predict all now known, and yet unknown, elements including their characteristics in the beginning of the 20th century based on a very simple but yet profound periodicity.

    He could be right, he could be wrong in all of his theories, but having his theory proven later for the elements might indicate he understood something.

    In a nutshell he claims that there is nothing but periodicity, this periodicity is always dual and consists of one and one thing only: electricity and its opposite side of the coin magnetism. The periodic is from almost zero electricity over a vast volume to maximum electricity condensed in a very small volume and back. The total potential never changes, just the dimensions so small amount of electricity x a lot of volume = great amount of electricity x less volume. We also call and understand things like this as pressure. If electricity causes magnetism and magnetism causes electricity to be broken down we could see something which breaks itself down and nothing remains, however cause and effect are instantaneous but shifted because one follows the other therefore balance will never be achieved anymore and the periodicity repeats itself forever.

    An element is but a representation of a single point in time of a complete cycle, so is our solar system or a rose, we never see a rose because if we would define a rose what would we say ? This flower or that flower ? A rose is also a complete cycle from seed till death and rebirth out of it seed but we only see a rose at a certain point in time. It will be different tomorrow, I promise.

    So is our universe a cycle, our solar system, our earth, we humans, a rose and everything else ?

    Because of the state our solar system is in (pressure ratio electricity/magnetism) and periodicity of some few billion years it could be considered an iron or manganese atom by some giants.

    To take it a little further, air doesn't change its substance when cooled or heated, only it's pressure and volume changes, if heated, it expands and "falls" or "gravitates" towards the pressure zone it belongs to. ( Up from our human standpoint, might be somewhat confusing ). The same happens if cooled, it will find its pressure zone. ( Down, now we understand, it must be gravity ;) )

    Maybe gravity is nothing else than a pressure difference and is an orbit of an electron or earth nothing more than the right pressure zone for any entity to be in depending on its own pressure.

    I don't have the answers, I'm on the same quest as you all and just hope I'm able to contribute something.



    -----------------------
    He who acts dutiful, adheres to norms true-hearted and decent is by no means despicable but neither moral. He continues the past without shaping the future. Moral is the act of shaping the future.

  4. #4
    co-founder
    Threadstarter

    7redorbs's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,743
    Liked
    258 times
    Images
    224
    Dear Rediscover,
    Thank you, so kindly for your reply, a most delightfully splendid read of some of the most important questions. Indeed, it is wrong, and I lack patience also for those who would hold onto the science of today, in place of the science we develop today for tomorrow. So many things can become deprecated, broken, or incomplete in the body of 'current' science, surely the imposers of what we call the current science, is from some of the greatest challengers of yesterdays normality. Indeed there are two 'currents'; and only one now. For the human being, now is surely the longest and shortest moment of their life - on a purely sociological or cultural level, granularity theory aside!!!

    You are right, my work but in particular this article answers few questions. Raises millions many more. If not in a diffuse attempt of informational awareness, in a bid to show the difference between a theory than answers all questions tidily, and another that can link them together by fact.

    Of course, when such a hypothesis links entangled systems like so, and it can be in some way founded. One could only dream that he or she is left with more questions than he started with, as usually what has really happened is _existing answers_ have been questioned, or contradicted in some way.

    Of course such a polar model would seem in some ways perfectly fitting to describe these 'currents' - but in some respect, perfectly unfitting, as symbolically one cannot have self referent higher reasoning - without fallacy. It would seem, there are 'inertial gravity waves' which can act instantaneously on another body. (say A to B) , latterly the gravity wave from B to A, can be different, from what I've read in ordinary science. So indeed, if a higher logic reasoning 'model' of polar electromagnetics, or dipole fields was to replace to science, interestingly a new problem is raised, what - if anything describes the polar model. (A tidy way to ask is there anything 'below' duality theory able to describe it better without a polar model?)

    Indeed, for instantaneous transmission we would be talking about a dimensional physics of some kind, what Tesla described as "scalar waves" or 'faster than C' transmission, there is an interesting lecture on longitudinal wave transmission, and postulates by a very interesting German physicist, Dr. Constantine I believe , who gave an excellent "Maxwell vs Faraday" lecture some years back.

    Interestingly, such examples can be seen easily; as electron flow increases in a mass in one direction , a second current forms in the opposite direction, which was named resistance; my real interest is in carefully inspecting this, and very careful inspection into the _real reasons_ why there is a need to measure a wire 100 times to ascertain what its current flow is _all of the time_.

    I put forward the idea that, the current flow is _never current_ - understandably ridiculous statement, but there is indeed absolutely nothing 'current' about it. The reason why the wire must be measured 100 times to gain 'average accuracy' - in fact measures the middle point of a resonating field. The only way to measure a middle point of a resonating field is to measure the resonance at distinct random intervals, to construct a picture as to where that middle point was.

    You could say, what the 'current' flowing in any wire is believed and stated as 'fixed' - but this can only be 'affixed' by the repeated measurements of what you call periodicity, if i understand the meaning of the term correctly.

    Exactly this too, the changing measurements or 'flux' , are based on the periodicity of the intervals of measurement - as much as the periodicity of intervals of the element. In QED, it could be stated, that it is not possible to remove fully the quantal interaction of the observer, as well as the objects and arrangement of the laboratory directly affect the resonance of 'chance' tree's, this can be done numerically, studying virtual particle exchange, and Feynman excellent diagrams on 're-emission' of photons, and non-linear virtual particle interaction (temporal virtual particle exchange).

    In modest words, I would say the works of gentleman such as Tesla, Schroedinger, Schaubergers and Viktor S Grebinikov show a clear fundamentalism in the existence and use of non linear science with a linear application. For example, the Casimir device inside a vacuum; two plates are placed inside the vacuum very close - oh I don't know, let's say approaching the resonance of virtual particle vibration on a single field (e.g. x to x ) can extract latent infinite phase vacuum energy. I have also had the crazy thought that the vacuum may act as some sort of cosmic attractor, or gate, for the entry of electrons, rather than a purist 'it must be zpe' approach.

    I would have to agree that it most certainly is a matter of harmonic resonance, that is C is not a limitation, it is a constant. I would argue that vacuum exists everywhere. Vacuum appears to be created by 'negative pressure' - this is fundamentally wrong perception. And has misled science in my astute opinion. In fact, removing the air from the fabric of space, WITH negative air pressure, leaves behind (if a perfect vacuum) one thing - the physical space of nothingness.

    We call this nothingness - a vacuum, and assume that because we used negative air pressure to create it that a vacuum is caused by removing air, and thus the assumption that space is devoid of air, it must therefore be assumed space is a vacuum.

    You could say, the knowledge, in so very many ways are there, I think the greatest proportion of the struggle is the so called rational resistance to the raising of such basic questions of higher reasoning, when indeed these supposed higher reasoning define the constraints of this so called 'rational science' we are served with currently.

    Again, the phase distribution of a vacuum being geometrically spherical (infinite vector of phase angle) - says a lot as to where polarised electromagnetic currents really may emerge from, perhaps the vacuum - this so called implosive force can collect energy, and the opposite explosive force dissipates it quickly. One could argue that the attributes of a vacuum are one of energy conservation and draw, and the attributes of explosive force from matter interaction in any space (where a vaccum exists everywhere) are of energy conversion, dissipation, and repulse. An interestingly similarly example as to the reasoning you stipulate.

    One thing to consider , which i strongly believe could be the case, if periodicity is truly the highest modal logic of expression in universal physics and electromagnetic and string theory, then - perhaps the space in between the poles is in fact as important as science recognizes it to be. This does seem to be the point of overlaying interaction, the beginning and end of the cycle, are in fact the same point (1.00) or 12 o clock.

    This above paragraph is shrugged off and dimissed by many philosophers and scientists, it is perhaps slightly philosophically dishonest at best; the reason why I do not think it should be ignored is , that if the space in between or distance (periodicity) implies a different tree of interaction (say tesla's interest in why arcs of electricity appears to change their 'ground target').

    That is so much to say, that the distance you put 'stuff' apart from one another, oh, I don't know say, pyramids, or the ley lines that separate ancient and important cultural heritage sites around the world, there is a measurable change in the flow of wind, an electromagnetic phenomenon - implying a certain level of archaic understanding, and religious divination involved around the understanding and interfacing with such a communication union.

    Perhaps why churches give 'communion' maybe? In any case, an extremely accurate word, on sociological and cultural values, can sometimes interestingly extend themselves to a greater understanding of the actions of men in science, as equally as science can teach of sociological and cultural errors. Dare one say that all roads lead to rome, in this case somewhat more literally than purely figuratively. And no, I am not trying to be outwardly religious. Perhaps though, there is some recognition in archetypal symbols, the word 'god' - a label to hebrew as everything, everywhere - is often the word replaced in quantum physics as 'inf' - even in higher reasoning - irrationality seems to be an important part of the synthesis of rational numbers.

    Indeed, disproving duality theory may be difficult, however - with some understanding of the culture of Egypt, some basic philosophy, stories from The Bible, and a few good physics books (even if they are from that evil culture of hit it with a hammer) - i believe much of the lesson is knowing the difference between a good method and a good tool.

    Indeed, knowing a good programming language tool, from a good 'method' , is the constituent failing of society today. Egypt had less technology and more philosophical wisdom, indeed - you have what you use, but you don't necessarily use what you have. It seems, the more of one drawing 'current' you have, the more you are open to leakages.

    Perhaps those physicists had the right idea measuring for the 'middle' - the tool was right, just not the method. I believe that the rationalist approach of tossing a coin up being 'always 50:50' is a lie that begun in the inspection of this 'middle polar interaction' - what we didn't realise that, just because 4 in 10 people get cancer, doesn't make 'each individual' subject to that also applies to the coins. Indeed they are alive.

    Interestingly, even if I was wrong about all of this, the mechanics of at least the human being flipping a coin 50:50 will eventually reach 0 whilst approaching infinity, rather than the opposite because, the very design and width of variation of the mechanics and psychology of human beings is no balanced, or static, it is dynamic, biased, and seems to be a human device itself created to propagate these opportunities with higher logic.

    Indeed, it is our own capacity to accept ourselves that can be the hardest of all things. Indeed evolution gave man something quite different. The ability to understand what bluffing is, from then on its a hall of mirrors of inconceivable amount of reflections, one does not need a cortex of infinite instrumental synthesisal magnitude to replicate it.

    Indeed, I dare to say once you understand chance, you can never again be subject to it in the same way - observer principle still applies, this is true. And I believe it is also why - Quantum Physics must revise the meaning of probability or Quantum probability. You can try this, and interestingly, because of the observer principle - if you believe it will work it will _change things_ maybe not in the way you wanted, but change can and does occur, as surely as a man waving his hands around in a park calling local estate people scumbags gets a beating. As surely this, does the human bias, begin to teach us that we not only are biased to this thing called 'chance' - but can control it , as well as detect it, and far more accurately than 50:50.

    I'm saying that a science of unique events might find out, that each event is unique - thus it can never be 50:50.

    Mad stuff huh ;-)

    I must say how delighted it is to see someone interested in this stuff. Me and Frog are very interested in this stuff, and I am writing a book about this sort of thing. This is my latest conjecture/hypothesis, that the vacuum is a circular or vortex force of infinite phase and direction towards the (yup you got it!! ) the middle point. I definitely agree the middle point or half phase is where our sine wave comes from, so yes - only the foundation of modern analog and digital systems - arguably the most technologically sophisticate and cultural achievement of the planet, or so our scientific community may continue to wrongly believe.

    Anyone who has studies this field can begin to see that, we write our stories ourselves because we have that ability, which is why so many scientists cannot ponder as to why so many people resist some of their truths - indeed, emotions the other side of man, are seeking the same center as the vacuum, balance.

    And that is why this work is beautiful and should be appreciated. It really is a union, just completely not the one I , and I'm sure other investigators of this field could possible ever expect, dream for, or ask upon! Perhaps the vacuum really is gravity, at the very least, I think the vacuum is like a massive invisible copper cable that has infinite number of vectors, exists everywhere, and carries all energy accross it.

    Very bold, and please ;-) prove me wrong, as I am poor and destitute and surely my crappy lab there is little experiments I can do with vacuums currently

    Yours Truly,
    A

    ps. perhaps if you understand the propagation of the chance tree, and empowerment, the term 'hysteria' involves not pseudo-psychological sciences at all - but understanding it, or hysteria, makes you subject to it, how? A bit of hysterics would always be an interesting distraction, I wonder if I will ever see it again! ;-)

  5. #5
    Moderator
    Rediscover's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    36
    Liked
    2 times
    Hello 7redorbs,

    Many many thanks for your info, nice things for the brain.

    So indeed, if a higher logic reasoning 'model' of polar electromagnetics, or dipole fields was to replace to science, interestingly a new problem is raised, what - if anything describes the polar model. (A tidy way to ask is there anything 'below' duality theory able to describe it better without a polar model?)
    All right, very interesting question, I'm going to try... just my thoughts...

    Yes there is something below this theory, a calm sea of potential potential or quantum field, just throw the stone and see duality (highs and lows) appear. One cannot exist without the other, just try to imagine where the water should come from if you would only have highs or even more ... could there be highs if there are no lows, sound without silence, dark without light ?

    The whole essence of something in existence is it's difference from it's surroundings, this could mean that without difference or polarity nothing has any existing form, it might be there but it's just not distinguishable from it's environment. This looks very much like the equipotential in quantum mechanics, everything is available everywhere, just create the right potential at the right time and place and it will emerge. Potential implies duality because it's the difference between two pressures either electrically or whatever.

    This of course leads to an interesting situation, just take a look at the electromagnetic spectrum, if something can only exist by having a boundary then itself is a boundary to adjacent items. Red cannot exist without orange and therefore orange not without red.

    To me this leads to the following: either everything exists and has always been or nothing exists at all. Let's for the sake of it take for granted this still ocean of potential potential or zero-point field. Somehow it is there and there are strict laws (our natural laws) maintaining it, everything floats in there having a boundary. If we take the analogy of an ocean these boundaries are indeed pressure boundaries, warmer water will flow up until it reaches the lower pressure boundary of air because of greater volume/lesser pressure.

    Understanding the mechanics of this might be achievable, formula's can be created, it just needs a clear mind to start from.

    It starts out with just one thing and one property, electricity and motion. Balanced as a whole consisting of separated oscillating dual entities. The whole never changes, it can not. Still within it everything is possible as long as balance is maintained.

    In order to understand my view on electricity and magnetism I would like you to consider the following: any system which is an a state of gaining potential (charging) is increasing it's density and electrical charge, this compression causes radiation which I see as the discharging magnetic component. At any time is such a system in a perpetual alternating preponderantly charging or discharging state, maintaining it's own balanced charging and discharging because of the electrical and magnetic opposite action.
    This could be seen as a standing scalar wave, there's just one drawback, current day science only uses one part of the duality electricity/magnetism, we only measure charging electricity :-( and not it's discharging counterpart.

    To create in the biggest sense we probably should go all the way down to and beyond QM, understanding that quantum fluctuations are nothing more and nothing less than the creation of a balanced electric/magnetic potential which the field or sea of potential potential is made for.

    Maybe some THINKING could help us create.

    So much for the model, just enjoy it or dismiss it.

    I really think you are right when you think of vortex motion when a low potential big volume vacuum spirals into a high potential human senses perceivable mass and back to a low potential big volume vacuum, this even explains the hitherto not understood gyroscopic effect. Just imagine a non rotating axis revolving in a plane at its center which slowly moves upward converting its revolving in rotating, we end up with an axis rotating at 90 degrees to the plane. Here we find our singularity. Just continue and rotation will gradually convert to revolution again.

    If this would be really true, there could be no motion but spiralling vortex motion. Interesting.

    Also I think you are right by regarding a vacuum still a positive pressure, the lack of pressure does not make it negative. There is one thing however which keeps playing, is the distribution of pressure throughout space homogeneous ? Therefore why use the term vacuum if the vacuum 1000 miles from earth has very different properties than a vacuum 1000 miles from the sun. It seems that everything we do is relative to our earthly conditions, a fish in the sea will never know that there are other pressure zones until it experiences them by jumping out of the water, until then it might consider the sea as a vacuum, it swims almost without resistance.

    Many thanks for your enlightenment in above post and yes you are truly right, the beauty of man's pondering can never be appreciated enough therefore I am very glad you share your ponderings with me and I am very much looking forward to reading your book.

    Thanks

  6. #6
    co-founder
    Threadstarter

    7redorbs's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,743
    Liked
    258 times
    Images
    224
    Duality, the great egyptian idea present in every single artefact, and recognised by archaeologists as nothing but
    art, sociologically this is inept, scientifically this may be untrue, and mathematically this can be shown to be untrue. Binarism, or duality order is something to be admired, and has more to do with magnets and vortex fields
    than one might imagine.

    binarism - a mode of thought predicated on stable oppositions (as good and evil or male and female) that is seen in post-structuralist analysis as an inadequate approach to areas of difference; also : a specific dichotomy subscribed to or reinforced in such thoug
    The above quote is interestingly provocative, taken from the marriam-webster dictionary. Interesting in that
    binarism is seen as two incongruent truths as dipolar opposites. Wheras, what I think we are intimating - is that binarism is seen as an inadequate approach when these forces are considered oppositions, or seperate entities.

    Upon reverting to this 'archaically' heretical idea, one can learn of the possibility of binarism not being outdated at all under one scenario only, when implied as part of one closed system, systemically different from the widely interpreted meaning of binarism - opposing non single body approach. The earth is a single body and has two poles, and an equator for instance.

    Equally, the modern theory of information and computer systems is base 2, the most simplest , effective and widespread universal language developed is binary. The egyptians were just mad about the idea of binary. Even crazier about the idea of Triginometry, perhaps dark without light is eerily close to describing more than just electromagnetics, or magnets, but could go a long way to explaining a lot of the 'unexplainable' or 'unusual' finds of egyptian art.

    Upon careful inspection I see that the Egyptians had a basic understanding of conductors. I believe it was hancock who was seething with fury about the supression of iron artefacts being removed from the pyramid and taken to the British Museum of Antiquity, and hiding them away somewhere. Claiming it was hidden away mainly because of the inconvenient fact of when the iron age is placed, some time after the construction of the giza plateau. Indeed, if true, the idea of novelty, and resonance theory - something that the likes of terance mckenna largely popularised, there may be much history or 'secrets of the ages' that describe this 'advanced technology' story.

    Certainly we can agree, throughout the ages the human obsession with symmetry and mathematics can only now be easily seen as temporal and dimensional in nature. Or perhaps, the idea was just reborn.

    General madness aside:

    You could say that defining a boundary implies a centre or container, you could say that the glass is half full, but what you really mean the glass is half full & half empty. You could say that where the nothingness affects where the 'stuff' is. And the base level of space (or vacuum) itself is the real predicate at work in binarism. Information Theory, gravity theory. That is some strange instanteous carrier we call gravity, we could say what humans imply as an object cannot be defined without other objects. Or other space. Or understood, and it seems gravity has this in common with human beings. Perhaps something of our inability to reach it fully speaks volumes in comparison to this similarity - that they are dependancies, or rather gravity is the predicate of them.

    I believe that there is some sense in saying that 'only one half' of electricity, perhaps the belief that these fields are seperate and non interdependant leads to this conclusion, and adoption of technology. Or worse, the intentionality of the great expense that likely arises due to possibly the greatest 'misunderstanding' of stable systems.

    That they aren't stable at all, the reason why they are stable is because they are in constant perpetual equilibrium. Since perpetual motion seems to be reserved for the planet at the ignorance of most scientific journal, it is difficult to point out that perpetual motion and gravity are by hell the longest metaphorically lost friends one could ever meet.

    With the idea of this vacuum and the vortex in mind, I think phase and the number of phase vectors could be an essential element to understanding that the ether may comprise of 3 vectors(or phases), but much like the image thumnail for this article - has only 2 sides. Therefore completing the vortex spiral.

    And yes, I could be totally wrong about this, but as you say in another thread, wisdom is some form of synthesis between intuition and awareness, combined to make reasoning, wisdom and logic. Sometimes it is good to shoot a lot of ideas at once. This pressure thing troubles me a lot,

    I think it is as simple as this. The vacuum exists in all space as a 'default' 'null', over time objects move into this space, and change the value of this field. When the object, or air are drawn out via negative pressure, a synthetic vacuum is not created, but re-initiated.

    That is, the space never changed from the negative pressure, but the state or 'property' of space is. By the distribution of electromagnetic fields that inhabit it, once removed the, space itself 'reverts', not created. Thus we can conject that the vacuum could possibly be 'part of the one', and that dualistic and binary 'theology' in this matter of gravity are not totally unreserved sectors of inquiry.

    especially when relativity talks about the requirement of 2 or more objects. Especially when newton talks about 2 opposing currents, or forces. No, they wouldn't have it that easy, ;-)

    yours truly,
    A

  7. #7

    remelic's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8
    Liked
    2 times
    Quote Originally Posted by 7redorbs View Post
    Duality, the great egyptian idea present in every single artefact, and recognised by archaeologists as nothing but
    art, sociologically this is inept, scientifically this may be untrue, and mathematically this can be shown to be untrue. Binarism, or duality order is something to be admired, and has more to do with magnets and vortex fields
    than one might imagine.
    I agree with the magnetic understanding of the ancient Egyptians. They knew more about magnets then we give them credit for.

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Rediscover's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    36
    Liked
    2 times
    If we would define our world and try to put it into formulae immediately duality would occur.

    It's the = sign in any equation, the great exchanger between two potentials, one flowing from left to right above the other flowing from right to left, those two lines above each other couldn't be chosen more wisely.

    A mathematical correct world can only be defined by two interrelated equal sides. Everything can be expressed as something which it is not and still hold true. It needs to be expressed as something which it is not plus an addition to make it equal to what it is. Something is created.

    1 is
    1 = 1
    1 = some other form of 1
    1 = not 1 + something
    something = 1 - not 1
    something = part of 1

    Every mathematical expression, scientific proof if you like, seems to proof only one thing, creation is the art of balancing. The expression itself seems to be the definition of the exchange, the word spoken in creative, balanced language. The terms would be all possible somethings, they are infinite in number but all part of 1.

    From Tao: The unnameable creates one, one gives birth to two and two gives birth to three and three created all things. Loosely translated to: The unnameable creates magnetism, magnetism gives birth to electricity, electricity gives birth to exchange and exchange creates every possible expression.
    He who acts dutiful, adheres to norms true-hearted and decent is by no means despicable but neither moral. He continues the past without shaping the future. Moral is the act of shaping the future.

  9. #9

    flabakani3's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    10
    Liked
    2 times
    There is loads of mathematics found at the following site about the waves.

    MATTER IS MADE OF WAVES
    " The material Universe is solely made out of Aether "
    by Gabriel LaFreniere.

    Matter is made of waves

  10. #10
    co-founder
    Threadstarter

    7redorbs's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,743
    Liked
    258 times
    Images
    224
    I can't believe I missed these posts.

    Great stuff guys!


    Best,
    A


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome!
CONSPIRACY.CO is a new community that rejects suppression. We permit free, respectful and open communication.

"Be the change that you want to see in the world."
-Mohandas Gandhi

Sort by Content
Friends




 

TwitterCounter for @Conspiracy_Co

   

your link here..

Support Us!

Choose Amount



World News
Sponsors