Visitors
the greatest lie yet , just not quite how we expected (www.CONSPIRACY.CO)by Adam Bull, CONSPIRACY.CO Conspiracy Network
Some may be surprised to know the Abydos Glyph enigma is not so debunked as we've been led to think. The likes of Hancock, Melchizedek and Dunn, although deserving a special place in the best of skeptics' hearts, actually might have a point when certain under-the-breath marks such as 'conspiracy' and 'supression' are uttered; in the case of the Sphinx, it would seem - indeed - something still clearly isn't quite right, as much as it had seemed that the Abydos glyph had been metaphorically put to bed, by the authoritative specialists and experts, whom in archaeology we trust.
Well, folks, as it turns out there are a lot of problems with the current put-to-rest theories. In fact, there are many problems with both the archaeologically accredited stories and other alternative claims! Both make as little sense of each other, when inspected closely. It can in fact be shown clearly the Abydos Glyph is not a palimpsest. It can be shown there is a high degree of order, and the accuracy of the golden rectangles within the Abydos piece show a highly ordered piece.
A Legitimate picture of the Abydos 'palimpsest' - or re-worked/reused tablet
A Touched up version of the picture circulating the internet that is NOT original
It's missing some features, how can only some of these features be so wildly different?
Who created the above picture thats circulating on the internet? Is it's only intent to show
how the 'tank' can be an egyptian heiroglyph obscured by palimpsest?Or for other reasons?
Where it all Began
Fox's world-wide Egyptian Television Special "Opening the Lost Tombs Live from Egypt" were broadcast live from Egypt's Giza Plateau on march 2nd 1998, this included a segment where Richard C. Hoagland presented evidence that had never been seen on network television before, hinting towards a prior 'high-tech' civilization period prior to the known Egyptian Civilization.
Such glyphs were made popular by this "Enterprise Discovery", and the glyphs discovered carved into ceiling beams of a 3000-year old New Kingdom Temple, just over a hundred miles south of Cairo and the Giza Plateau, at Abydos. The glyphs can be found located just below the several hundred ton ceiling.
Where we stand
Hoagland alleged that these admittedly [astonishingly-modern-looking flying machines would have been completely impossible under any current archaeological views of the sophistication of ancient Egyptian Technology. ]
Of course, any Egyptian Archaeologist knows that such talk of remote viewing is void in a field of archaeology without supporting data, to an archaeologist it is clear the Egyptians could not have created such technology themselves and it was considered a void and debunked story; given no discovery withstanding of there being any highly sophisticated technologies to create such high technology. If this is enough for an archaeologist to debunk Hoagland (which it isn't), enter palimpsest theory - that in fact the Abydos Glyph is a re-worked piece , and over thousands of years the older or newer cement falling out, creating a circumstantial unrecognizable glyphs. An investigative journalist with a degree of occult knowledge and a general scientific understanding could lean towards the Egyptian Remote Viewing explanation, the Egyptian Dynasties did possess divination systems and sophisticated teachings (extremely likely to be sourced from Sumaria ref: Annuna Ki, the 50 gods of earth sand-script/Hebrew text ['This is not our knowledge, it was given to us by the Annuna Ki]'). That said, much of it was allegedly lost in the great fires. Of course such notions are amazing , yes. However in conventional cultural thinking Remote Viewing is still, somewhat considered a Metaphysical Pseudoscience, with no real evidence in a Lab (i.e. Randii et al). To properly smoke this gun, a deeper inspection must be required, not only supported by a body of archaeology, but a body of science and inspection of ancient civilizations as a whole.
The current favored, 'goal' in archaeological explanation for the Abydos tablet is that it was a Palimpsest ( a re-used / reworked tablet), the reasoning behind this specifically is that the 'symbols' in this one tablet appear bizarre, astounding even. With an imagination one can easily see markings that look like modern vehicles, but the Palimpsest theory says that's just a co-incidence, they are 'unreadable' hieroglyphs , as archeologists such as Katherine Griffis-Greenberg :
"It is acknowledged by all (AFAIK),that it is a carved limestone that was altered in antiquity with plaster, to give a new meaning to the phrases. That is, BTW, part ofthe definition of a pampliset, of which these inscriptions are a prime example" - K G G - International Association of Egyptologists University of Alabama at Birmingham , Member, American Research Center in Egypt
|
The Problem (or the pertinent questions)
That the scene is a palimpsest of course! - and not a single work?
What difference would it make if it was not a palimpsest? - and in actual fact a single work? If any?
None,The abydos scene would not be judged on its own, but be judged by extrapolation from the rest of archaeology, and indeed reality, whichis then presented monolithically opposed.
|
Leaving any decisive verdict in relegation , still, even not as a palimpsest entrenched in conservative consensus. Clearly, there are many similar itineraries of controversy in the Egyptian Dynasties, but none quite so strange as this. So, ifthe scene was not a palimpsest , it could not be hieroglyphic either(the symbols are improperly formed), and would have to be considered an artwork or derivative artwork (palimpsest). Since arts realms merge into reality and fantasy, we would end up with at the beginning again,with the conclusion based on the chance and artistic endeavor.
The conclusion that any archaeologist is forced to take can only be dependant on the assumption of Chaos as a ruling force behind the Glyph. The only real way to destroy this consensus is to
prove that the fundamental nature of the glyphs is not subject to chaotic forces, but instead to rational order. * vejprty.com
|
Not only do we have to prove that the objects in the glyphs were created deliberately, but we have to establish that the creator was more than an artist. To make the glyphs scientifically meaningful, they would have to be custom designed, constructed and encrypted with exact order.Then the glyphs would take on special significance. Geometrical engineering of the glyphs draws parallels with engineering of advanced transportation technology, which it may be showing.
|
The Golden Section
Another great mystery similar to the Abydos mystery is the Golden Section, some research might suggest that the Egyptians DID NOT know the Golden Section. This may not be valid, and we can explain why.
In fact, under geometrical analysis, not only does the Abydos Tablet hold up to displaying deliberate, non chaotic, precise creation. It is order of the highest magnitude, and the reconstruction of the Abydos tablets below serve as proof to this premise.
Throughout this analysis we will be using AN ORIGINAL UNTOUCHED Abydos Glyph picture, and not a touched up, modified one.
Geometrical Analysis
As the Abydos columns text does look fairly auspicious, it begs testing for orderly attributes, the findings are simply astounding. An Archaeological analysis of the Abydos Glyph may be in order.
1 unit (diameter of semi circle)
2 an axis
Golden Rectangle Geometrical Analysis & Archaeology: The Abydos Helicopter & The Golden Section
Above - The semicircle in the glyph looks quite true, when tested by a circle.
|
Golden Rectangle Geometrical Analysis & Archaeology: The Abydos Helicopter & The Golden Section
The usual construction begins with the six operations, or steps, asshown above. Circles '4', and '5' help in obtaining the axial cross,and are discarded afterwards. After this we have a choice of two operations, which will produce the Φ-ratio in the position. The diagram below uses the big green circle concentric with the red circle.
The yellow circle represents the glyphic semicircle, and becomes the red circle in the diagram below. The green circle from above is replaced by the blue square below.
|
Golden Rectangle Geometrical Analysis & Archaeology: The Abydos Helicopter & The Golden Section
The diagram of the classic Golden Section was imported into the Abydos image by scaling the unit circle to the semicircle in the image. As seen below, this experiment worked like a charm.
|
"We are looking at the proof that the glyphs are proportioned by the Golden Section along the horizontal axis. The area under the helicopter is sectioned by vertical lines into Φ proportions.
If the semi-circle's radius counts as 1 then the breadth of the row ofsix columns on the horizontal axis is (Φ²) 2.618.. From the semi-circleto the left on the axis we see successively the distances of:"
0.5 ←→ 0.5 ←→ Φ-1 (0.618..) ←→ Φ-1 x Φ-1 (0.381966..) ←→ Φ-1
and combined distances like
1 ←→ Φ (1.618..) ←→ 2 ←→ Φ² ( 2.618..)
Golden Rectangle Geometrical Analysis & Archaeology: The Abydos Helicopter & The Golden Section
The square that we employed for the Golden Section turns out to fit the square formation of columns, and triangles.
To get to its present location, the square rotates 45 degrees, and slides to the area's boundary on the left. Then it slides down, until the x-axis becomes the square's upper Golden Section divide (below).
|
The square fits the glyphic square of columns, and triangles very well on three sides, but we do see a bit of imprecision at the top. But, this is amply made up for by the accuracy of the Φ-rectangles within this square.
Here, it should be pointed out that it is the triangles, which give us the width of the square, and actuate the golden proportion. According to Egyptologists' chronology, the columns came first, but according to the reconstruction by the Golden Section, the points of the square had been given before any corresponding columns could be created!
|
Golden Rectangle Geometrical Analysis & Archaeology: The Abydos Helicopter & The Golden Section
Horizontal lines from E, and F, with the vertical line from H, divide the square into golden sections. The lines are set by both the top and bottom of the middle triangle row, the upper columns, and by the upper edges ofthe inner rectangles at bottom left . The square as above contains no less than eight Golden Rectangles, plus corresponding squares. All fitthe layout of the engraved square really well.
|
Two big golden rectangles: horizontal width = 2.618..units, height = 1.618 units
Golden rectangles based on the unit circle (base 1 unit long, height 0.618)
Golden Rectangle Geometrical Analysis & Archaeology: The Abydos Helicopter & The Golden Section
We can recreate the golden rectangle limiting the area under the helicopter, because its left bottom corner coincides with the square's corner. The big rectangle from under the helicopter just happens to also be the perfect container for the upper two craft on the right, as well, if we see the plane as transporting a suspended object. The plane's horizontal axis, which seems engraved in, is at the same time a Golden Section line for the rectangle.
The rectangle on the left contains five smaller golden-rectangles, and they all fit the engraving. The entire area under the helicopter forms a perfect Golden Rectangle, when the helicopter's belly rests upon the upper line of the rectangle, although it's hard to see at this resolution. Fortunately, this marvelous fit is easy to see in the blow-up below .
|
Golden Rectangle Geometrical Analysis & Archaeology: The Abydos Helicopter & The Golden Section
Apart of the rectangle line was cut away, because it was screening outthe belly line of the helicopter. The fit is visually perfect. Mindfulof the excellent fit of the other three sides, we can say that thisrectangle is highly accurate.
|
Another close-up then shows how the other rectangle also fits right on, at the top.
|
Layout
There are containers for all the objects, the 'Abydos Craft' haverectangular frames, which size is determined by the size of the object.
Golden Rectangle Geometrical Analysis & Archaeology: The Abydos Helicopter & The Golden Section
Therectangle frames two of the suspected craft together with visualperfection (it is the tightest rectangular container for these twoobjects). Again it is a perfect (CAD drawn) GOLDEN RECTANGLE. (theratio between its sides is Φ).
Just like the helicopter reposes on a golden-rectangle, so does the boat/tank .
|
a. All the area under the 'helicopter' is contained in a golden rectangle
b. The Helicopter and 'boat/tank' sit on golden rectangles
c. Four of the rectangles originate from the lower left corner and two from the right
d - the two yellow rectangles are of the same size
e - the rectangle on the lower right also contains a perfect square anda smaller rectangle. Adding, or subtracting a square from a goldenrectangle makes for another golden rectangle. So, the smaller rectangleis also a golden rectangle!
Golden Rectangle Geometrical Analysis & Archaeology: The Abydos Helicopter & The Golden Section
Eachof the four Φ-rectangles above (two yellow, two cyan, with bases equalto the semicircle's base) has an engraved line, which divides it into asquare, and another golden rectangle. That's altogether eight goldenrectangles. Evidently, the whole area is carefully planned.
|
From this great archaeological work one is now forced to believe, thatnot only did the Egyptians understand how to use the Golden Ratio, butthat the archaeology itself is not a palimpsest, for if it were, itwould truly be the most unique archaelogical evidence ever found in apalimpsest to date, it is the opinion of the writer that muchdistortion arrives in Egyptian Archaeology either intentional orotherwise, especially in the case of the Abydos tablet, it has beensubject to much debate and venom.
It would appear, yet again, the sheer sophistication and expertise ofthe Egyptian empire are missed on our modern ideas of expertise, eitherby error or by wish, by fact or fiction, and there is more - thistablet, if not an artwork, and if not a hieroglyph, what? Not only isit not a palimpsest but it has a great amount of order to it, are wesupposed to believe that the Egyptians were remote viewers? No, theirsno archaeological evidence for that.
There is archaeological evidence to support this tablet in the oldSumeria though, now known as Iraq, there are many popularized Sumeriantablets that lay out quite clearly our local star system of planets,and in Sumerian text it actually says the "50 Gods of Earth" or, theAnnuna Ki are the ones who 'gave them' that evidence. Richard C.Hoagland is indeed one of my heroes, and I could not thank him enoughfor getting the publicity and hype this needs in our modernized versionof society.
I think however, that even Hoagland will have to step aside on thisone. The archaeology doesn't point towards RV, the archaeology doesn'tpoint towards our technology either! It points towards something thatwill astound you all... and it is quite obvious when you see. TheEgyptians used hieroglyphics techniques to create much of their art,this tablet was rushed, quickly, and was a little sloppy, why? Thetablet uses similar heiroglyphic shapes to draw the symbols, why? Thegolden rectangles indicates 2 ships are sitting on top , and one shipgoes into 2 golden rectangles, why? Is this intentional, yes, but why?
I think we know why, because the ships are intentionally linkedtogether (look at the tablet) - it's implying they are 'insideeachother' or part of a union. We're being visited folks, and someonedoesn't want us to know, and whoever drew that tablet, probably did aswell. Aliens have been visiting Sumeria, Egyptians and Americans for avery long time indeed. One doesn't have to look in prophecy far, butyet again the sciences and 'experts' mislead us, until they get somemore upto date information or technology. Well, the Egyptians didn'twait around for that, and apparently they never needed to either. Thewriter sits back in his seat, surprised it got this far in history atall. It's the writers opinion, history and Egyptology books are goingto change, and if they don't then the history books are just plainwrong.
Thereis one aspect of the inscription which is puzzling. The temple inAbydos (or Abdjou, as the location was called by Egyptians), is quite aremarkable edifice, especially as far as the quality of glyphs isconcerned. They are all very precise and as far as I can judge, there'sno trace of sloppy workmanship anywhere in the temple, bare the aboveinscription. " - Lumir G Janku
|
Thanks Lumir G. Janku, but inarchaeological fact, the truth is diametrically opposite. It reallydoesn't leave much to ponder as to why Graham Hancock thinks expertsshould be banned altogether.
What we've learnt
1. The Abydos Glyph may not be a palimpsest at all.
2. The previous palimpsest theory was so compelling, nobody bothered to test the work for geometrical order and layout ( it's illedigble, why bother?)
3. The piece shows a high amount of Geometrical order and Layout order, which contradicts the palimpsest notion
4. There never was, and still hasn't been another piece like this is found in the entire 3000 yr old New Kingdom Temple.
5. Not being a palimpsest, why so untidy? It may have been 'rushed', as it is shown the work is carried out by a highly skilled Mason.
6. This may be a much more geometrically significant piece
7. There is a picture circulating on the internet that omits important features of this piece, which is likely NOT to be a palimpsest
8. There has never been any proof that this is a palimpsest, other than the conjectural explanation of a combination between co-incidence , damage, and supposed illegibility.
9. Their not glyphs or a palimpsest, what are they?
10. Some pictures from STS88 were released by EOL JPL GOV FTP server, showing one piece of space debris, the similarities are not just identical
a. The ratio's seem to be 'golden' on the space debris
b. the space debris appears to change into a variety of shape (throughout the shoot) - yes it is spinning but look closely
Stuff worth considering fairly
c. 'The bird' with unusual dimensions that was argued for so long in Archaeology fits over this 'space debris' perfectly.
d. this 'bird' seems to be the central piece to the work.
e. just another coincidence mr. archaeologist? Sod you, if you'd tested the damn palimpsest for order you'd have contradicted yourself:
f. or did someone intentionally remit that analysis as not to confuse your biased correctness(es) in the field.
g. ever seen Stargate SG-1? Ever seen a hatak mothership?
h. ever heard of a gentleman called Dan Burisch who insists he is MJ12 #1, and that STARGATE SG-1 is a disinformation campaign in case anyone ever discovered the truth about stargates, abydos, and alien technology
i. 1 hatak mothership which is the same object as the other below pictures, can magically morph shape (just like in SG-1), and one of the shapes fits centrally into the palimpsest piece, which apparently is not a palimpsest.
j. The work not a pure heiro-glyph or a pure palimpsest. It's a drawing of Master 'god' in the sky, drawn in a rush by a fine craftsman.
k. if you saw this ship in the sky, how fast would you try to draw it?
l. the lost temple of the new kingdom, was the beginning of a new age for egyptians, why?
m.All of the things that explicitly state these connections have been removed in the touched up picture
m i - 4 lines against the master semi circle symbol - missing
m ii- 'tank'shows each ship is 'inside' each other. As if to imply they are 'in eachother', missing
m iii - 3 lines on the 'tank' - hard to observe
m iv - 'bird' is faint, looks more birdlike
m v - connection between 'submarine at bottom right'and the 3 pillars to the left of it - missing
m vi - connection between helicopter and bird not visible - missing
m vii - helicopter 'inside' not as clear showing 'fractality' and a relationship between the pairs
m viii - golden rectangles show relationships between the objects in a highly ordered fashion suggesting the 'ships' havea relationship.
m viiii - STS-88 'space debris' fits 'bird' exactly, 'bird' shows no inner fractality - suggesting it's the 'master' as labeled with the semi circle
m X - extreme postulation: 'bird' fits fractally/golden ratio/golden rectangle/contrasting ratio size with the other 4 ships and a relationship has been shown intentionally in somany ways to stop us from missing it. Adam thinks someone wanted us to miss it.
The writer considers there will never be enough proof, especially with masons hiding it all from you so often.
It's actually a surprise this one ever survived for so long. Perhaps because the tomb was opened 'live'? Doubt they opened it live. They probably checked first to make sure it wasnt a sore disapointment. I guess, a few people really did thing this was a palimpsest, and it really was a mystery. I'm sure you'd never have seen this glyph if it was picked up sooner it needed a DISINFO sticker on it.
Thanks for reading , now enjoy the real good stuff from STS-88, I'm assured by nasa and others this is ONE OBJECT - space debris; you tell me.
Adam Bull
Richard Hoagland, The Enterprise Mission
Golden Rectangle Geometrical Analysis & Archaeology: The Abydos Helicopter & The Golden Section
|
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Adv Reply
Threadstarter
Welcome!
Friends
Support Us!
World News
Sponsors